PDF General Certificate of Education Academic Assistance. strict liability summary strict liability summary strict liability crime which has no mens re requirement in respect of at least one element of the actus reus The person who directly and immediately causes the actus reus of the offence is the 'perpetrator' or 'principal', while those who assist or contribute to the actus reus are 'secondary parties', or 'accessories'. Harrow London Borough Council v. Shah (1999) 2 Cr App Rep 457 (CD) 320 Cases Referred To. She hoped to . (1957) 37 T.C. Shah v Gale [2005] Shakoor v Situ [2001] Shami v Shami [2013] Criminal Prosecution, Planning Enforcement RD September 2012. Regina v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex parte Shah: HL ... - swarb.co.uk B v DPP - e-lawresources.co.uk A shop keeper was held liable even though it . Possession claim, secure tenant, succession, Housing Act 1985 s89. Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource - SlideShare Baturina . Give the case and the area of law for absolute liability Larsonneur and Winzar . UK - R (on the application of Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business ... Strict liability 2013 14 - SlideShare Download Download PDF. We lead the way . United Kingdom Cases page 226. Held: Appeal dismissed and conviction was upheld. the court had jurisdiction under ord 23, r 1 (1) (a) of the rules of the supreme court "if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, it thought it just to do so" to order a plaintiff. v Harrow Crown Court [2006] UKHL 42 UK - R. (on the application of Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence . Council tax discount, council tax support, housing benefit, jobs, free school meals. 11 In the case Harrow LBC v Shah, such an issue was also prevalent. Litigating the Public Sector Equality Duty: The Story So Far In the case of Alphacell v Woodward [1972], the defendants of a company were accused of causing pollution to a river. . This page provides a list of cases cited in our Criminal Law Lecture Notes, as well as other cases you might find useful. Got it so far? .". In this case even the use of an expert (a vet) was insufficient top avoid liability. He complains of words which he says Mr de Freitas spoke or wrote, or . In summary what did Roscoe Pound say when explaining the need for statutory offences of strict liability?